Ryan Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 One of the ideas I had for a storyline in 2007 that now it was the kids house, it actually became a teens house, in the way that The Palace was, though Noah, Hayley, Josh, Dani were all a few years older, and she had Cassie, Ric etc all living there. I don't know how it would have worked out, but I certainly think it might have be an interesting route to take. I do think the Tony situation is however symptomatic of some of the loose writing that is prevalent.
TachelHolden Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!! You think Mattie got the house you don't know for sure because it was never mentioned .. well they never said "Matilda you now own your mothers house" how fair is that to the others , would you be happy if something that should be split equally got given to just one person.
-Kevin- Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!! You think Mattie got the house you don't know for sure because it was never mentioned .. well they never said "Matilda you now own your mothers house" how fair is that to the others , would you be happy if something that should be split equally got given to just one person. I distinctly remember Mattie saying something to Tony about the house not being all his after he had sept with Naomi!!
TachelHolden Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!! You think Mattie got the house you don't know for sure because it was never mentioned .. well they never said "Matilda you now own your mothers house" how fair is that to the others , would you be happy if something that should be split equally got given to just one person. I distinctly remember Mattie saying something to Tony about the house not being all his after he had sept with Naomi!! That doesn't mean to say she meant it was her's it could be all of theirs.
-Kevin- Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!! You think Mattie got the house you don't know for sure because it was never mentioned .. well they never said "Matilda you now own your mothers house" how fair is that to the others , would you be happy if something that should be split equally got given to just one person. I distinctly remember Mattie saying something to Tony about the house not being all his after he had sept with Naomi!! That doesn't mean to say she meant it was her's it could be all of theirs. Well hers , theirs doesnt matter , their family pictures should remain on the wall!! Wow just because Rachel moves in their family pictures should be taken down!??! No thanks
TachelHolden Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 I never said that , i didnt start this and certainly didnt say their "family pics" should be taken down ... tbh i dont even see any family pics in the house.
-Kevin- Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 I never said that , i didnt start this and certainly didnt say their "family pics" should be taken down ... tbh i dont even see any family pics in the house. This is what this thread is about There was a comment from someone about Robbie and Tasha's wedding picture being still in Tony's house and they said that Beth's stuff should be turfed out and "burnt" < "somebody" said that
martha-jack Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 ^^ noo i loved Robbie and Tash don't burn their picture, but take Beth's stuff nah am kidding, i think Tony would like to keep something of Beth's at least, he may be with Rachel but it would be kind of disgusting to burn her things at least send them to Mattie or one of her kids.
Mrs Bishop Posted February 26, 2009 Report Posted February 26, 2009 I think photoes of all that have lived in different homes should stay. Hunterts there should be pics of Beth Jack Lucas Rachel and tony plus Matilda. Leahs should be Leah with Vinnie Leah with Dan Leah with the boys there is also a photo of Kirsty and Kane but there are no pics of Peter or Pete and Amanda. In Irenes there are photoes scarrtted all over plus Haley did a painting of her dad Ken with Irene will Nick and her self and so it should be. The same in the Caravan house there should be photoes so the vewiers dont for get.
martha-jack Posted February 26, 2009 Report Posted February 26, 2009 Leahs should be Leah with Vinnie Leah with Dan Leah with the boys there is also a photo of Kirsty and Kane but there are no pics of Peter or Pete and Amanda i get what you mean but if Leah was ever with someone or got married again it might be a bit weird for her having pics of her ex's all over the wall plus seeing as thought she 'lost' Vinnie and Dan i think its a part of her closure to take them down. EDIT: isn't there also a sketch of Noah in Noah's bar? im sure there is.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.