-Kevin- Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 Someone said a while ago to me about how in Tony/Rachel's house theres pictures of the Hunter's and that they should be taken down !! Its the same when someone dies and there pictures get taken down like I remember Leah taking down her and Vinnie's wedding pictures from her mantle piece. What do you think ?
-Kevin- Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 I think the Hunter family pictures should stay up on the wall and I dont care if its now Rachel and Tony's house because it was the Hunter family home - and Matilda half owns the house and I would be pretty upset if I was her and returned to see all her family photos gone!!
martha-jack Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 I agree with the hunters house and i would be upset too if i returned and my family pictures were all taken down so i think they should stay, are there still pictures of Sally in the main house, i havn't really payed attention to it?
DinerLandlord Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 I haven't seen any pictures of Sally, but there is definitely one of Mattie and Cassie in the hall. Leah has KK's wedding picture in her house. I don't know why though. Irene has the best pics, she has Will and Gypsy's wedding photo, and Tasha and Hayley(ginger one), and even Tug!
martha-jack Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 really, i havn't noticed any of them, shows how much i pay attention
.Amy. Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 Leah has KK's wedding picture in her house. I don't know why though. They were good friends before Kirsty left. People generally don't take down pictures when someone dies so why should H&A be any different? Did Leah not take Vinnie's picture down when she met Dan?
Posy Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's?
halcyon06 Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 I think I saw a picture of Vinne and Leah at her 30th birthday party, it was in the background of a screencap of Charlie that I have.
-Kevin- Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!!
DinerLandlord Posted February 23, 2009 Report Posted February 23, 2009 Matilda half owns the house Is that right? There were five Hunter children (Scott, Kit, Robbie, Matilda, Henry) and I thought that they inherited it equally from Beth. How come half of it could be Matilda's? I think Mattie got half because she was the only one who was living there as her home!! They may have had Tony and Rachel buy Mattie's half off-screen or something, just like they have never shown or mentioned Rachel divorcing Kim, despite her plans to marry Tony . If Tony ever leaves the Bay, they better explain just how much of it he owns if he sells the house.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.