Emmadolly Posted March 20, 2006 Report Posted March 20, 2006 Remember a few months ago, when Collen bought a new home, and she went to see it with Lance. Then the deal fell through. Tasha felt guilty and re-payed it back to Collen, as she felt guilty. Because of Josie. So when Josh West gave Collen her money back, Why has'nt she returned Tasha's money back. She has doubled her money. Am i right or wrong, or have i just missed a thread about it.
Krazy Karl Posted March 20, 2006 Report Posted March 20, 2006 What was Josh's money actually for though...
Ryan Posted March 20, 2006 Report Posted March 20, 2006 Why would Josh West give Colleen money for something Brett Macklin did? What I think you might be getting muddled up with is that in 2003 Josh was responsible for Colleen getting her home bulldozed and so was compensating her for this?
Emmadolly Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 If you can remember last week, when he was trying to get onto the better side of the summer bay residents. He gave Collen a cheque for what he owed her. For a deal he messed up. And Collen was singing his praises for returning her money. And Alf was getting annoyed so much that he has decided to run against Josh in the Mayor elections?????????? Wake up people
ste Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 The josh west and brett macklin storylines are so similar that it's confusing.
Ryan Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 I've not seen last weeks episodes, but I'm pretty sure it will have something to do with what happened in 2003.
Emmadolly Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 ok sorry, as they are very much alike, so why did Josh gave Collen money. My brain went into over drive .SORRY.
-Tess- Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 Josh gave Colleen money to pay her back, because he burned down her caravan in 2003. That's all that we were told, if my memory serves me correct.
ste Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 He didn't burn it down, he demolished it with a steam roller (Not him personally, but his company). He eventually did buy Colleen a new mobile home, after much persuation, but he never compensated her for the loss of her personal belongings and memories. I believe Colleen didn't have the energy or money to take him to court. So that is probably what he gave her the money for.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.