JamieHT Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 I never liked Kirsty and Kane, Kane annoyed me how he talked through his teeth (even more so when he was angry) Kirsty was just whiney. I thought they were a really unbelievable couple. However we must give them their due, and I feel that they should be put forward for the Guinness Book of Records for the couple who called each other babe the most in the history of television. I was so happy when they left. I like both Jack and Martha as individuals, and I think they make a much more attractive couple than Kirsty and Kane, and much less frustrating.
xGlowingAngelx Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 I never liked Kirsty and Kane, Kane annoyed me how he talked through his teeth (even more so when he was angry) Kirsty was just whiney. I thought they were a really unbelievable couple. However we must give them their due, and I feel that they should be put forward for the Guinness Book of Records for the couple who called each other babe the most in the history of television. I was so happy when they left. I like both Jack and Martha as individuals, and I think they make a much more attractive couple than Kirsty and Kane, and much less frustrating. lol that Babe comment made me laugh. I thought they were sweet though
claire_louise Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 Definitely Martha and Jack, at least that is a normal relationship!! Normal, but incredibly dull.
I love music Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 I have to say Kane and Kirsty. I don't watch H&A now but I've seen pictures of Martha and Jack and I think a lot of the attraction for ppl is that they "look good" together. Jack is very handsome and Martha very pretty. Kirsty was very pretty too but (tho he had really nice eyes) I don't think Kane was particularly good looking. But their relationship had so much depth and the way, in the beginning, they fought so hard against falling in love, desperate not to hurt anyone, made for a gripping story.
Tamxxx Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 Martha and jack interest me more then other couples but definetely don't beat kane and kirsty,and i'm not just saying that because im a k/k fan.The reason is because there is no intersting history between them,whilst k/k had all this forbiden relationship,jack and martha seems ordinary as cassie and ric,and as mentioned before thay are pretty dull.
claire_louise Posted May 21, 2006 Report Posted May 21, 2006 It isn't because they aren't controversial that I don't like them. There have been plenty of 'normal' relationships that I've found really interesting. Angel and Shane, Lachie and Chloe, and Hayley and Noah, to name a few. I just find JM a bit boring and cliched. If they get some decent storylines I could well change my mind as there is potential there.
xGlowingAngelx Posted May 21, 2006 Report Posted May 21, 2006 I do agree there. Jack and Martha a favourite amongst viewers (myself included), however, they don't really have anything amazingly special about them, except for the fact they look good and care for one another, whereas with Kirsty and Kane, they had so much history.
griseknoen Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 If I compare the two couples: KK in 2004 and JM in 2006, I find both couple boring. KK has gotten extremly boring after everyone accepted them. There is just so much drama that I really don`t care anymore. And I can`t think of another couple, that despite being meant to be, could be more wrong. I really don`t care about the reasons why Kane raped Dani, and if he didn`t know what he did was wrong. It was wrong, and I really feel Kirsty was too selfish when she got into a relationship with and later married Kane. And Kane was selfish for coming back for her. As for Jack and Martha, I haven`t seen their whole story, but in the Australian episodes at the moment, I don`t see any chemistry between them what so ever. But at least they are a normal couple without to much drama, so they are watchabel. As for people likeing Jack and Martha for their looks:Martha is pretty but I find Jack really scary. So for the time being I like Jack and Martha the best. But their in no way a favourite of mine.
angel luck Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 Kirsty and Kane they were alot more interseting because of their storylines and they are two of my all time faveourite characters. i Feel there was also more chemistry between them and they always appeared so in love, more than Jack and Martha do i don't see what the big deal is with them, there good but not great.
xxgulcanxx Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 I think both couples are nice. Kirsty and Kane had more chemistry,and were more interesting, but Jack and Martha, also act lovingly sometimes,although they don't show it much.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.